Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
     
    
 
                                                Posted:
                            
                                1 decade ago                            
                            
                                2012/02/17 1:43 GMT-5                            
                        
                        
                                                    Why don't you use the general form ?                                                
                                                
                            Why don't you use the general form ?                        
                                                
                                                                                                            
                                             
                                            
                                                
    
        Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
     
    
 
                                                Posted:
                            
                                1 decade ago                            
                            
                                2012/02/17 8:26 GMT-5                            
                        
                        
                                                    have you tried to put dp/dx as the source term 'f' in the coefficient form? Correct me if I'm wrong: source term can be anything, the Comsol solver will deal with it.                                                
                                                
                            have you tried to put dp/dx as the source term 'f' in the coefficient form? Correct me if I'm wrong: source term can be anything, the Comsol solver will deal with it.                        
                                                
                                                                                                            
                                             
                                            
                                                
    
        Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
     
    
 
                                                Posted:
                            
                                1 decade ago                            
                            
                                2012/02/17 9:18 GMT-5                            
                        
                        
                                                    Hi Murali, I can't see how that would change things... the general form should just be the compact version of the Coefficient Form PDE.                                                
                                                
                            Hi Murali, I can't see how that would change things... the general form should just be the compact version of the Coefficient Form PDE.                        
                                                
                                                                                                            
                                             
                        
                        
                                                
    
        Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
     
    
 
                                                Posted:
                            
                                1 decade ago                            
                            
                                2012/02/17 9:23 GMT-5                            
                        
                        
                                                    Ah, I think I get what you are saying is that I should rewrite things like:
dv/dt + v*dv/dx +dp/dx = 0  ==>
1/v * dv/dt + dv/dx = -1/v * dp/dx  ==>
1/v * dv/dt + dv/dx = -K/v , where:  dp/dx = K  
So I just add another equation! Well I think this trick should work.
Thanks Francois.                                                
                                                
                            Ah, I think I get what you are saying is that I should rewrite things like:
dv/dt + v*dv/dx +dp/dx = 0  ==>
1/v * dv/dt + dv/dx = -1/v * dp/dx  ==>
1/v * dv/dt + dv/dx = -K/v , where:  dp/dx = K  
So I just add another equation! Well I think this trick should work.
Thanks Francois.