Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2011/01/12 14:05 GMT-5
After looking again at my model, what I mean is that domains 2-3 should be overridden in Weak Form PDE 1, just like they are overridden in Coefficient Form PDE 1 and General Form PDE 1.
Francois
After looking again at my model, what I mean is that domains 2-3 should be overridden in Weak Form PDE 1, just like they are overridden in Coefficient Form PDE 1 and General Form PDE 1.
Francois
Ivar KJELBERG
COMSOL Multiphysics(r) fan, retired, former "Senior Expert" at CSEM SA (CH)
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2011/01/13 6:14 GMT-5
Hi
your node tree should be read from top to bottom, if you select a n element in the top node (one layer higher than your image) then ALL HAVE TO BE part of the first default. Actually you should go one level higher and unselect it there.
You can also add a "later" level node and redefined something existing previously, this gives the overridden or unavailable entries, that will fall-back here if the later node definition is i.e disabled or removed/deleted
the node icon >< defines if these are relative summing or absolute definitions (read through the doc)
--
Good luck
Ivar
Hi
your node tree should be read from top to bottom, if you select a n element in the top node (one layer higher than your image) then ALL HAVE TO BE part of the first default. Actually you should go one level higher and unselect it there.
You can also add a "later" level node and redefined something existing previously, this gives the overridden or unavailable entries, that will fall-back here if the later node definition is i.e disabled or removed/deleted
the node icon >< defines if these are relative summing or absolute definitions (read through the doc)
--
Good luck
Ivar
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2011/01/13 8:48 GMT-5
Hi Ivar,
Thanks for the follow up.
Adding a "later" level node and redefine something existing previously gives the overridden or unavailable entries only in the Coefficient Form PDE or General Form PDE modes, but that doesn't work in the Weak Form PDE mode. Look at the model file attached on my 1st thread, this is the difference (bug?) that I wanted to point out.
I know that I could do 3 separate nodes and select only 1 domain on the highest level of each node, but it's not an elegant way to proceed since I would have to link the internal boundaries manually with pairs in order to solve for the same dependent variable in the 3 nodes/domains, etc.
Francois
Hi Ivar,
Thanks for the follow up.
Adding a "later" level node and redefine something existing previously gives the overridden or unavailable entries only in the Coefficient Form PDE or General Form PDE modes, but that doesn't work in the Weak Form PDE mode. Look at the model file attached on my 1st thread, this is the difference (bug?) that I wanted to point out.
I know that I could do 3 separate nodes and select only 1 domain on the highest level of each node, but it's not an elegant way to proceed since I would have to link the internal boundaries manually with pairs in order to solve for the same dependent variable in the 3 nodes/domains, etc.
Francois
Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
Posted:
1 decade ago
2011/01/13 10:09 GMT-5
I hadn't noticed that Weak Form PDE nodes are "Contributing nodes" and not "Exclusive nodes", that's why they don't override previous selections. I guess it's for keeping the Weak Form mode the most flexible possible.
Thanks Ivar for pointing me out the >< icons.
I hadn't noticed that Weak Form PDE nodes are "Contributing nodes" and not "Exclusive nodes", that's why they don't override previous selections. I guess it's for keeping the Weak Form mode the most flexible possible.
Thanks Ivar for pointing me out the >< icons.