Robert Koslover
                                                                                                                                                    Certified Consultant
                                                         
                            
                         
                                                
    
        Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
     
    
 
                                                Posted:
                            
                                8 months ago                            
                            
                                2025/03/03 22:40 GMT-5                            
                        
                        
                                                    Do you have a version of your .mph file in English?
    -------------------
    Scientific Applications & Research Associates (SARA) Inc.
www.comsol.com/partners-consultants/certified-consultants/sara                                                 
                                                
                            Do you have a version of your .mph file in English?                        
                                                
                                                                                                            
                                             
                                            
                                                
    
        Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
     
    
 
                                                Posted:
                            
                                8 months ago                            
                            
                                2025/03/04 9:34 GMT-5                            
                        
                        
                                                    Hello, I have re-uploaded the English version of the .mph file. My issue is as follows: I am currently using the Electromagnetic Waves, Frequency Domain (RF Module) to construct an antenna, with the frequency range set from 0.7 GHz to 5.1 GHz, in steps of 0.6. The computation process is very slow, and eventually, an error occurs. I hope that the S11 parameter and the Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR) of this model can be calculated up to 5.0 GHz and above, ensuring that the S11 parameter value is less than -10. I previously consulted with you and received your reply, and indeed, I was mistaken. After recalculating according to the solution you provided, the error still persists. The error message is: "Feature: Stationary Solver 1, Failed to find a solution. Linear iteration diverged. The returned solution has not converged. Not all parameter steps have been returned." Could you please tell me what might be causing this? Is it a problem with the model? How can this issue be resolved? Thank you very much for your assistance!
                                                 
                                                
                            Hello, I have re-uploaded the English version of the .mph file. My issue is as follows: I am currently using the Electromagnetic Waves, Frequency Domain (RF Module) to construct an antenna, with the frequency range set from 0.7 GHz to 5.1 GHz, in steps of 0.6. The computation process is very slow, and eventually, an error occurs. I hope that the S11 parameter and the Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR) of this model can be calculated up to 5.0 GHz and above, ensuring that the S11 parameter value is less than -10. I previously consulted with you and received your reply, and indeed, I was mistaken. After recalculating according to the solution you provided, the error still persists. The error message is: "Feature: Stationary Solver 1, Failed to find a solution. Linear iteration diverged. The returned solution has not converged. Not all parameter steps have been returned." Could you please tell me what might be causing this? Is it a problem with the model? How can this issue be resolved? Thank you very much for your assistance!                        
                                                
                        
                                                
                                                                                                            
                                             
                        
                        
                                                
    
        Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam
     
    
 
                                                Posted:
                            
                                8 months ago                            
                            
                                2025/03/04 11:58 GMT-5                            
                        
                        Updated:
                            
                                8 months ago                            
                            
                                2025/03/04 13:25 GMT-5                            
                        
                        
                                                    I approximately halved the mesh size and switched the Analysis Methodology from Fast to Intermediate. It solved in 2 min at the highest frequency.
(added note: actually it was the mesh size that made the difference, not the Methodology. I have seen this behavior before where a mesh size too large refuses to converge. I assume this is because some details of the field cannot be represented with the larger mesh size. Also: it looks like this problem can be reduced by one quarter using symmetry).
                                                 
                                                
                            I approximately halved the mesh size and switched the Analysis Methodology from Fast to Intermediate. It solved in 2 min at the highest frequency.
(added note: actually it was the mesh size that made the difference, not the Methodology. I have seen this behavior before where a mesh size too large refuses to converge. I assume this is because some details of the field cannot be represented with the larger mesh size. Also: it looks like this problem can be reduced by one quarter using symmetry).